The challenges of digitizing the education system in geographic areas with development disparities: a case study of Oltenia county, Romania
Published Online: May 13, 2026
Email:
roxanibarbu@gmail.com
University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Email:
aurelbaloi@graphit.ro
University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Graphit Innovation Factory, Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania
Email:
rafaelgruia@graphit.ro
Graphit Innovation Factory, Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania
University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Email:
gruia.manuel@gmail.com
University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Graphit Innovation Factory, Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania
Email:
daniel.peptenatu@geo.uniubuc.ro
University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Views: 326
Downloads: 29
Download PDF
Abstract:
Digitalization is an essential vector of global transformation, which, through the integration of digital platforms and artificial intelligence in education, is bringing about profound changes in teaching, learning, and assessment, as well as structural changes in society. Objectives: The objective of the research is to understand how a county with significant development disparities uses the opportunities offered by digitization as a solution for optimizing territorial management policies. The research identifies and describes the uneven distribution of investments and purchases of IT equipment for education, as well as highlighting patterns of spatial distribution of digitization in the education system. Methods: The research used data provided by the SICAP, the electronic platform that ensures the transparency of the public procurement process and procedures in Romania, which includes relevant indicators on public procurement in the education system, 2007–2024. Indicators such as the number of public procurement procedures associated with the digitization of education and budget allocations, broken down annually and by place of residence (urban/rural), were analyzed. Data processing was performed in Python/JupyterLab (Pandas, Matplotlib, Seaborn), and territorial distributions were evaluated in QGIS using choropleth maps and bivariate maps. Results: Disparities in the digitization of the education system in Olt County have a clear territorial structure, organized into clusters of advantages, concentrated in urban centers and more developed peri-urban areas, where infrastructure, educational resources, human capital, and administrative capacity are concentrated, and clusters of vulnerability, specific to peripheral rural areas. Conclusions: Spatial models offer an essential methodological advantage when analyzing regional disparities in the digitization of education, in order to understand "where" the phenomenon occurs and, above all, "how" it spreads and amplifies across the territory.
Keywords:
JEL Classification:
I25, I26, I 28, R11
How to cite:
Barbu, R., Baloi, A.M., Gruia, A.R., Gruia, M.F., Peptenatu, D. (2026). The challenges of digitizing the education system in geographic areas with development disparities: a case study of Oltenia county, Romania. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 7(2), 449-464, https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2026.7.2(10)
References:
-
Akbari, K., Winter, S., Tomko, M. (2021). Spatial causality: A systematic review on spatial causal inference. Geographical Analysis, 55, e12312. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12312
-
Alcacer, J., Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2016). Internationalization in the information age: A new era for places, firms, and international bussiness networks? Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.22
-
Andronache, I.C, Peptenatu, D., Ciobotaru, A.M., Gruia, A.K., Gropoşilă, N.M. (2016). Using fractal analysis in modeling trends in the national economy. Procedia Environmental Science, 19(1), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2025-0295
-
Băloi, A., Belean, B., Turcu, F., Peptenatu, D. (2024). GPU-based similarity metrics computation and machine learning approaches for string similarity evaluation in large datasets. Application of soft computing, 28, 3465–3477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08687-8
-
Băloi, A., Costea, C., Gutt, R., Bălăcescu, O., Turcu, F., Belean, B. (2023). Hexagonal-Grid-Layout Image Segmentation Using Shock Filters: Computational Complexity Case Study for Microarray Image Analysis Related to Machine Learning Approaches. Sensors, 23(5), 2582. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052582
-
Brandsen, T., Honingh, M.E. (2016). Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465
-
Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C., Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12238
-
Burton, J., Kemp, D., Barnes, R., Parmenter, J. (2024). A socio-spatial analysis of Australia's critical minerals endowment and policy implications. Resources Policy, 88, 104448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104448
-
Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M.B, Herstad J.S (2017). Advancing Regional Innovation Systems: Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning C, 35(4), 600-620
-
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. DOI: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945
-
Curran, D. (2020). Connecting risk: Systemic risk from finance to the digital. Economy and Society, 49(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1718912
-
Dede, C., Jacobson, J., Richards, J. (2017). Introduction: Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education. In: Liu, D., Dede, C., Huang, R., Richards, J. (Eds) Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education. Smart Computing and Intelligence. Springer: Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_1
-
Diaconu, D.C., Andronache, I., Pintili, R.D., Brețcan, P., Simion, A.G., Drăghici, C.C., Andreea, G.K., Alexandra, G., Marian, M., Daniel, P. (2019). Using fractal fragmentation and compaction index in analysis of the deforestation process in Bucegi Mountains Group, Romania. Carpathian Journal of Earth Environmental Sciences, 14(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.26471/cjees/2019/014/092
-
Downes, L., Nunes, P. (2013). Big Bang Disruption. Harvard Business Review, 91(3), 44-56
-
Fantechi, F., Fratesi, U. (2024). Spatial patterns of territorial competitiveness: The role of peripherality, urbanization and physical geography. Socio Econonmic Planning Sciences, 91, 101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101754
-
Godin, V., Terekhova, A. (2021). Digitalization of Education: Models and Methods. International Journal of Technology, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i7.5343
-
Greenberg, M., Schneider, D., Cox, L. (2025). The use of public spatial databases in risk analysis: A US‐oriented tutorial. Risk Analysis, 45, 1632–1647. https:/doi.org/10.1111/risa.17705
-
Herman, G.V., Grama, V., Sonko, M.S., Boc, E., Băican, D., Garai, D.L., Blaga, L., Josan, I., Caciora, T., Gruia, A.K., Grecu, A., Peptenatu, D. (2020). Online information premise in the development of Bihor tourist destination, Romania. Folia Geographica, 62, 21–34
-
Jamil, S. (2021). From digital divide to digital inclusion: Challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunication Policy, 45(8), 102206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102206
-
Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., Gurrib, I. (2023). New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution. Sustainability, 15, 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
-
Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
-
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
-
Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 402 p
-
Mutsvairo, B., Ragnedda, M. (2018). Eds. The Digital Inclusion: An International Comparative Analysis. Lexington Books, 244p
-
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
-
Nograšek, J., Vintar, M. (2014). E-government and organisational transformation of government: Black box revisited? Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.006
-
Okoye, K., Campos, E., Das, A., Chakraborty, V., Ghosh, M., Chakrabarti, A., Hosseini, S. (2025). Impact of digitalized-education upon sustainable education and practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature based on pre-intra-and-post pandemic and rural education development. Sustainable Futures, Vol.10, 100851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100851
-
Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. DOI: 10.4324/9781315204956-3
-
Peptenatu, D., Andronache, I., Marin, M., Ahammer, H., Radulovic, M., Jelinek, H.F., Gruia, A.K., Grecu, A., Constantin, I., Mihăilă, V., Diaconu, D.C., Savulescu, I., Băloi, A., Drăghici, C.C. (2025). Using Succolarity as a Measure of Slope Accessibility in Undeveloped Areas. Land, 14(11), 2171. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112171
-
Peptenatu, D., Băloi, A., Andronic, O., Bolocan, A., Cioran, N., Gruia, A., Grecu, A., Panciu, T., Georgescu, L., Munteanu, I., Pistol, A., Furtunescu, F., Strâmbu, I., Ibrahim, E., Băiceanu, D., Popescu, G., Păduraru, D., Jinga, V., Mahler, B. (2024). Spatio‐Temporal Pattern of Tuberculosis Distribution in Romania and Particulate Matter Pollution Associated with Risk of Infection. GeoHealth, 8(2), e2023GH000972. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gh000972
-
Pierce, G., Cleary, P. (2024). The persistent educational digital divide and its impact on societal inequality. PLOS ONE 19, e0286795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286795
-
Pintilii, R.-D., Peptenatu, D., Drăghici, C., Saghin, I., Stoian, D.-R. (2015). Structural Changes in the Entrepreneurial Profile of the Creative Industries in Romania. Procedia Economics Finance 23, 1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00397-4
-
Pintilii, R.-D., Peptenatu, D., Ciobotaru, A.-M., Toma, S.G., Grigore, A.M., Drăghici, C.-C., Dobrea, R.-C., Simion, A.G., Andronache, I., Teodorescu, C. (2017). Creative economies in Romania-Spatial projections and trends. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 37, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0027
-
Ragnedda, M., Gladkova, A. (2020). Eds. Digital Inequalities in the Global South. Springer International Publishing. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research-A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32706-4
-
Selwyn, N. (2016); Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
-
Sindakis, S., Showkat, G. (2024). The digital revolution in India: bridging the gap in rural technology adoption. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00380-w
-
Tekic, Z., Koroteev, D. (2019). From disruptively digital to proudly analog: A holistic typology of digital transformation strategies. Business Horizons, 62(6), 683-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.002
-
Viczko, M. (2016). A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning, by Michael Fullan and Maria Langworthy (2014). Leadership Policy in Schools. 15(2), 231–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1073331
-
Wagner, D.A. (2017). Technology for education in low-income countries: Supporting the UN sustainable development goals. In ICT-Supported Innovations in Small Countries and Developing Regions: Perspectives and Recommendations for International Education (pp.51-74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67657-9_3
-
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press, 272p
-
Worrall, L., Bond, D. (1997). Geographical Information Systems, Spatial Analysis and Public Policy: the British Experience. International Statisticai Review. 65(3) 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1997.tb00314.x
-
Zhang, J., Li, S., Lin, N., Lin, Y., Yuan, S., Zhang, L., Zhu, J., Wang, K., Gan, M., Zhu, C. (2022). Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China. Land Use Policy, 106058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106058