Intellectual property disclosure and corporate value in Japan
Published Online: May 13, 2025
Email:
eiji.h1018@gmail.com
Graduate School of Technology Management (MOT), Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan
Email:
odatetsuaki@gmail.com
Graduate School of Technology Management (MOT), Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan
Views: 403
Downloads: 15
Download PDF
Abstract:
Objectives: This study quantitatively examines the relationship between intellectual property (IP) information disclosure—based on the 2021 revision of Japan’s Corporate Governance Code—and the financial performance and market valuation of Japanese companies. As the foundation of corporate value and competitiveness continues to shift from tangible assets to IP and other intangible assets (IA), companies’ strategies for investing in and utilizing these assets have become increasingly important. Methods/Approach: The analysis targets companies listed on the Prime and Standard Markets of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. It applies two-group comparison tests to assess differences in financial performance between a disclosure (comply) group and a non-disclosure (explain) group, classified in accordance with Supplementary Principles 3.1.3 and 4.2.2 of the 2021 revised Corporate Governance Code. Both accounting-based and market-based performance indicators are examined to evaluate the relationship between IP information disclosure and corporate value. Results: The results indicate that the comply group, which discloses IP information, engages in more active R&D investment, achieves higher profit margins, and exhibits greater market capitalization than the explain group. However, no significant difference was observed in market-based indicators such as the price-to-book ratio (PBR), suggesting that investor evaluations do not fully reflect the business advantages associated with IP disclosure. Conclusions: These findings suggest that companies disclosing IP information tend to be more innovation-oriented and financially competitive. Nonetheless, such advantages are not sufficiently captured in market-based valuations, likely due to structural characteristics of Japanese companies, particularly in manufacturing sectors with large tangible asset bases. These structures reduce total asset turnover, thereby constraining return on equity (ROE) and PBR. The results underscore the need for improved IP/IA disclosure practices to enhance transparency, reduce information asymmetry, and foster better recognition of intangible value in capital markets.
Keywords:
JEL Classification:
E22, G34, O32, O34, O53
How to cite:
Hayashishita, E., Oda, T. (2025). Intellectual property disclosure and corporate value in Japan. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 6(2), 464-476, https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2025.6.2(13)
References:
-
Adelicia, C., Salsabila, W.G., Mohammad, W. (2023). The Effect of Earning per Share (EPS) and Return on Equity (ROE) on the LQ 45 Company’s Stock Price, Himeka: Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Vol.1, No.1, 2023, pp. 22-29
-
Brand Finance (2019). Global Intangible Finance Tracker (GIFT)—An Annual Review of the World’s Intangible Value, 2019, Brand Finance, Available online: https://brandfinance.com/wp-content/uploads/1/gift_2.pdf (accessed on February 12, 2025)
-
Bhagyalakshmi, K., Saraswathi, S. (2019). A study on financial performance evaluation using DuPont analysis in select automobile companies. International Journal of Management, Technology And Engineering, Volume IX, Issue I, January/2019, pp.354-362, DOI: 16.10089.IJMTE.2019.V9I01.18.27443
-
Edori D.S., Egileoniso D.J. (2024). Financial Performance and Investment Decision: Evidence from Investors and Stockbrokers in Nigeria, World Journal of Finance and Investment Research, Vol.8, no.1, 2024, pp. 49-63, DOI: 10.56201/wjfir.v8.No.1.2024.pg49.63
-
Fincham, R., Roslender, R. (2003). Intellectual capital accounting as management fashion: A review and critique. European Accounting Review, 2003, Vol.12, Issue 4, pp. 781–795. DOI:10.1080/09638180310001628464
-
Firer, S. (2005). Using intellectual capital as a success strategy in South Africa. Southern African Business Review, 2005, Vol. 9, Issue1, pp. 1–20
-
Glova, J., Mrazkova, S., Dancakova, D. (2018a). Measurement of Intangibles and Knowledge: An Empirical Evidence. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2018, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 76–80
-
Glova, J., Dancakova, D., Suleimenova, S. (2018b). Managerial Aspect of Intangibles: Own Development or External Purchased Intangible Assets—What Does Really Count?, Polish Journal of Management Studies. 2018, Vol.18, pp. 84–93. DOI:10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.07
-
Ishimitsu, Y. (2018). R&D costs and investor behavior, Chuokeizai-sha, Japan
-
Ito, K. (2014), "Competitiveness and incentives for sustainable growth: Building favorable relationships between companies and investors" project (Ito Report) Final report, [Jizoku-teki seichō e no kyōsō-ryoku to insentibu ~ kigyō to tōshi-ka no nozomashī kankei kōchiku ~' project], Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. Available from https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/economy/keiei_innovation/kigyoukaikei/pdf/itoreport.pdf (accessed February 12, 2025)
-
Kikuchi, O., Takano, S. (2022), Latest status survey on disclosure of "intellectual property and intangible assets" after the revision of the CGC [CGC kaitei-go no `chizai mukei shisan' jōhō kaiji saishin jōkyō chōsa], Intellectual Property Strategy Promotion Secretariat, Japan Cabinet Office, Japan, June 29, 2022, available online. https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/tyousakai/tousi_kentokai/dai11/siryou5.pdf (accessed: February 12, 2025)
-
Kikuchi, O., Takano, S. (2023), Survey and analysis of the status of intellectual property and intangible asset governance among companies listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange Prime Market [Tōshō puraimu ichiba jōjō kigyō ni okeru chizai mukei shisan gabanansu ni kansuru taiō jōkyō chōsa bunseki], Intellectual Property Strategy Promotion Secretariat, Japan Cabinet Office, https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/titeki2/tyousakai/tousi_kentokai/dai21/siryou7-1.pdf (accessed: February 12, 2025)
-
Kodama, E. (2024). The Top 30 ESG Indicators for Enhancing Corporate Value (FY2024 ver.). ABeam Consulting Ltd. access https://www.abeam.com/jp/en/news/2024/1118/ (accessed: February 12, 2025)
-
Lin, Y., Ye, J. (2024), The impact of corporate R&D on the transformation of intellectual property into intangible assets, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 70, December 2024, 106337, DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2024.106337
-
Madhani, P.M. (2012), Intangible assets: Value drivers for competitive advantage. Best Practices in Management Accounting, 2012, pp. 146–165, DOI:10.1057/9780230361553_10
-
Tairov, I., Stefanova, N., Aleksandrova, A., Aleksandrov, M. (2024). Review of AI-Driven Solutions in Business Value and Operational Efficiency. Economics Ecology Socium, 8, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.3-5
-
Tomo (2022). Intangible Asset Market Value Study Report 12 28 22, Ocean Tomo Investment Group, 2022, Available online: https://oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market-value-study/ (accessed: February 2025)
-
TSE (2021a). Japan’s Corporate Governance Code, June 11, Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc., Japan, Available online: https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/equities/listing/cg/tvdivq0000008jdy-att/20210611.pdf (accessed: February 12, 2025)
-
TSE (2021b). Revisions of Japan’s Corporate Governance Code and Guidelines for Investor and Company Engagement, Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc., Available online: https://www.jpx.co.jp/english/equities/listing/cg/tvdivq0000008jdy-att/b5b4pj00000436l7.pdf (accessed: February 12, 2025)
-
TSE (2023). Action to Implement Management that is Conscious of Cost of Capital and Stock Price, Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc., Japan, Available online: https://www.jpx.co.jp/news/1020/cg27su0000004ybo-att/cg27su0000004yem.pdf (accessed: February 12, 2025)
-
Yanagi, R., Yoshino, T. (2017), Consideration of the relationship between human capital, intellectual capital and enterprise value (PBR), [Jinteki shihon chiteki shihon to kigyō kachi (PBR) no kankei-sei no kōsatsu], Gekkan Shihon Shijo, 2017.10, No.386, pp. 4-13.