Access Journal

Access to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy
The journal uses continuous publication model. Current issue is in progress.
Published Online: Nov 26, 2024

Consumer behavior in the self-tracking style, preferences, and perceptions of fitness gadgets

Published Online: Nov 26, 2024
Views: 136
Downloads: 14
Download PDF

Abstract:
Objectives: The development of computer technologies, information systems, and the Internet creates fundamentally and qualitatively new opportunities for independent control of the state of the body and human health, including in-home, household, and everyday conditions. Health monitoring processes' new possibilities and realities require appropriate study, analysis, and understanding. Methods/Approach: The paper aimed to study the various aspects of self-tracking, as trends in the active use of various technological gadgets for self-monitoring, as well as the attitude of young people to digitalization, computerization of medicine, and the use of electronic medical gadgets, smartphones, Internet resources for self-control of the health. The methods of search, analysis, and generalization of relevant scientific publications, as well as a survey of young users of fitness devices, were applied. Results: Features, advantages, disadvantages, and prospects of self-tracking as a social phenomenon in health care have been given, and features of youth perception of digital medicine and gadgets for health monitoring have been established. Self-monitoring is becoming a strong trend in preventing a healthy lifestyle and control of the body in a digital revolution and comprehensive computerization of society. Conclusions: Fitness gadgets, cloud, and internet technologies open up qualitatively new opportunities for healthcare. At the same time, many new, complex ethical and technological issues arise, among which personal data protection should be highlighted.
Keywords:
Pages:
46-66
JEL Classification:
D10, D91, I12
How to cite:
Dorokhova, L., Beloeva, S., Venelinova, N., Dorokhov, O. (2025). Consumer behavior in the self-tracking style, preferences, and perceptions of fitness gadgets. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 6(1), 46-66, https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2025.6.1(3)
References:
  • Adu, M., Malabu, U., Callander, E. (2018). Considerations for the development of mobile phone apps to support diabetes self-management: systematic review, JMIR mHealth uHealth, 6. https://doi.org/10.2196/10115
  • Ajana, B. (2018). Self-tracking: empirical and philosophical investigations, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2
  • Asenov, A., Aleksieva, D., Stoyanova, S., Rusenov, G. (2017). Innovative practices for good management. Scientific research Almanac, ISSN: 1312-3815, Vol.24 (1), pp.343-372. https://almanahni.uni-svishtov.bg/title.asp?title=656
  • Batalden, M., Batalden, P., Margolis, P. (2016). Coproduction of healthcare service, BMJ Quality & Safety, 25, 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315
  • Botti, A., Monda, A. (2020). Sustainable value co-creation and digital health: the case of Trentino eHealth ecosystem, Sustainability, 12, 5263. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135263
  • Clarke AE, Shim JK, Mamo L, Fosket JR, and Fishman JR. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review. 68(2):161-94.
  • Crawford, K., Lingel, J., Karppi, T. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: a hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415584857
  • Didžiokaitė, G., Saukko, P. (2017). The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: beyond the metaphor of quantified self. New Media and Society, 24, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698478
  • Dorokhova, L., Dorokhov, O., Hutorov, A. (2020). Consumer behavior modeling for fitness services evaluation. Studies in Business and Economics, 15(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2020-0026
  • Dorokhova, L., Nencheva, I., Dorokhov, O., Yermolenko, O., Penev, N. (2024). Consumer behavior modeling of “smart” scales choosing. Access to science, business, innovation in the digital economy, ACCESS Press, 5(1), 141-162, https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2024.5.1(9)
  • Fjeldstad, Ø., Johnson, J., Margolis, P. (2020). Networked health care: rethinking value creation in learning health care systems, Learning Health Systems. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10212
  • Fotopoulou, A., O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer, Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582
  • Gilmore, J. (2016). Everywear: The Quantified Self and wearable fitness technologies. Media and Society, 18(11), 2524–2539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815588768
  • Gupta, S., Ryan, D., Kulkarni, R., Shea, W., Ramachandran, J. (2021). Health consumers want digital: It’s time for health plans to deliver, Cognizant: HFS Research, 23. https://www.cognizant.com/en_us/general/documents/cognizant-hfs-health-consumers-want-digital-its-time-for-health-plans-to-deliver.pdf (accessed on 20 December 2023)
  • Kent, R. (2018). Social media and self-tracking: representing the “health self”. In Ajana B. (ed.). Self-tracking: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_5
  • Kersten, E., Westerink, J., Beute, F. (2017). Personal informatics, self-insight and behavior change: a critical review of current literature, Human-Computer Interaction, 32(5–6). pp.268–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1276456
  • Kilova, K., Uzunova, S. (2020). Telemedicine in assistance to healthcare in the COVID-19 pandemic, Acta Medica Bulgarica, 4, 63-8. https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2020-0048
  • Kreitzberg, D., Dailey, S., Vogt, T. (2016). What is your fitness tracker communicating?: exploring messages and effects of wearable fitness devices, Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 17(1), pp.93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2016.1220418
  • Lindberg, J., Bhat, R., Ferm, A. (2021). Older people and rural eHealth: perceptions of caring relations and their effects on engagement in digital primary health care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 12953. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12953
  • Lupton, D. (2016). The Quantified Self: sociology of self-tracking. Malden: MA Polity, 240. https://www.wiley.com/en-au/The+Quantified+Self-p-9781509500635
  • Lupton, D. and Smith, G. (2017). ‘A Much Better Person’: The Agential Capacities of Self-Tracking Practices. In Metric Culture: Ontologies of Self-Tracking Practices, edited by Btihaj Ajana, Emerald Publishing, London. preprint, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3085751
  • Lyall, B., Robards, B. (2018). Tool, toy and tutor: subjective experiences of digital self-tracking, Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/144078331772285
  • Malterud, K., Siersma, V., Guassora, A. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research. 26(13), pp.1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
  • Nafus, D., Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: the quantified self-movement as alternative big data practice, International Journal of Communication, 8, 84–94. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
  • Öberg, U., Orre, C., Isaksson, U. (2018). Swedish primary healthcare nurse perceptions of using digital eHealth services in support of patient self-management. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. Vol.32, pp.961–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12534
  • Petrova, M., Sushchenko, O., Trunina, I., Dekhtyar, N. (2018). Big Data Tools in Processing Information from Open Sources. IEEE First International Conference on System Analysis & Intelligent Computing (SAIC-2018)) Kyiv, Ukraine 08-12 October 2018, pp.256-260, DOI: 10.1109/SAIC.2018.8516-800
  • Pink, S., Fors, V. (2017). Self-tracking and mobile media: new digital materialities. Mobile Media and Communication, 5(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579176955
  • Rettberg, J. (2018). Apps as companions: how quantified self apps become our audience and our companions / Ajana B. (ed.). Self-tracking: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_3
  • Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A. (2014). Personal tracking as lived informatics. human factors in computing systems: proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, pp.1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039
  • Ruffino, P. (2018). Engagement and the Quantified Self: Uneventful Relationships with Ghostly Companions / Ajana B. (ed.), Self-tracking: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_2
  • Selke, S. Lifelogging. (2016). Digital self-tracking and lifelogging — between disruptive technology and cultural transformation. Springer, 376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13137-1
  • Spiller, K., Ball, K., Bandara, A. (2018). Data privacy: users’ thoughts on quantified self-personal data. In: Ajana B. (ed.). Self-tracking: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.111–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_8
  • Swan, M. (2009). Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 6(2), 492–525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6020492
  • Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: the realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen, Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2(3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm2030093
  • Topol, E. (2015). The patient will see you now: the future of medicine is in your hands. Healthcare Informatics Research. Vol.21(4), 321–323. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.321
  • Turner, G., Beets, M., Moore, J. (2013). Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an m-health weight loss program, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Vol.20(3), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510
  • Ushakova, I., Dorokliova, L., Maliy, V. (2020). Assessment of a pharmacy as a pharmaceutical service environment, Azerbaijan Pharmaceutical and Pharmacotherapy Journal, Volume 20(1), pp.24–30. https://www.azpharmjournal.org/en/jurnal/assessment-of-pharmacy-as-a-pharmaceutical-service-environment
  • von Thiele Schwarz U. (2016). Co-care: Producing better health outcome through interactions between patients, care providers and information and communication technology. Health Services Management Research. Vol.29(1-2). pp.10-15. doi:10.1177/0951484816637746
  • Voruganti, T., Grunfeld, E., Makuwaza, T., Bender JL. (2017). Web-based tools for text-based patient-provider communication in chronic conditions: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol.19, 366-373. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7987
  • Wang, J., Wang, Y., Wei, C. (2014). Smartphone Interventions for long-term health management of chronic diseases: an integrative review. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 20(6), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0243
  • Wannheden, C., Stenfors, T., Stenling, A. (2021). Satisfied or frustrated? a qualitative analysis of need satisfying and need frustrating experiences of engaging with digital health technology in chronic care, Frontiers in Public Health, Vol.8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.623773
  • Wannheden, C., Schwarz, U., Östenson, C. (2021). What’s the name of the game? The impact of eHealth on productive interactions in chronic care management. Sustainability, 13(9), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095221
  • Wildevuur, S., Simonse, L., Groenewegen, P. (2019). Information and communication technology enabling partnership in person-centred diabetes management: building a theoretical framework from an inductive case study in Netherlands. BMJ Open, Vol.9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025930
  • Zheng, E.L. (2023). Interpreting fitness: self-tracking with fitness apps through a postphenomenology lens. AI & Society 38, 2255–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01146-8

Publish your science journal

If you like ACCESS journals system, you can publish your journal with us at a reasonable price