The journal uses continuous publication model. Current issue is in progress.
Published Online: Apr 23, 2023
Comparative Measurement of Intellectual Potential in Economiсs of Ukraine and Romania
Published Online: Apr 23, 2023
Email:
ntid@ukr.net
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine
Email:
sushchenko.olena@hneu.edu.ua
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Email:
mmitkov@af-acad.bg
Bulgarian Air Force Academy "Georgi Benkovski", Dolna Mitropolia, Bulgaria
Email:
nvpoguda@gmail.com
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Views: 103
Downloads: 17
Download PDF
Abstract:
The article is devoted to solving methodological and practical problems of identification and measurement of national intellectual potential (IP). The relevance of this study is due to the fact that the level of IP is a determining factor in the prospects for the economic development of countries on an innovative basis.
Objectives: The object of research is the IP of Ukraine and Romania. The subject of the study is a comparison of the PI of these countries. The choice of countries for research and comparison on this indicator is due to a number of factors: close geographical location, GDP, the duration of the period of market transformation of the economy and others.
Methods/Approach: A statistical method of measuring IP based on normalized indices is used. The authors substantiate the original set of indicators used in the calculation of the general IP index and its components.
Results: The article summarizes the results of the analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the most common methodological approaches to measuring IP using the sum of the absolute values of the IP components (Scandia-navigator), the index method of dynamic measurement of IP (IC-dVal), the method of normalized indices, proposed by the UN. The article proposes the author's method of comparative measurement of individual entrepreneurs of the two countries on the basis of normalized indices. The system of indicators, which characterizes the level of human intelligence, artificial intelligence and intellectual products that are components of individual entrepreneurs, is substantiated.
Conclusions: To increase the reliability of the IP assessment, it is advisable to single out methodological tools for the influence of the state (government) and the market on the motivation of innovative work and innovative entrepreneurship. The approbation of the proposed methodology on the actual data of Ukraine and Romania, which are contained in international and national information resources, carried out in the article, makes it possible to draw a reasonable conclusion that Romania in the period 2016-2018 is approaching and ahead of Ukraine in terms of individual entrepreneurs.
Keywords:
JEL Classification:
J24, O15, O34, O52
How to cite:
Nykyforov, A., Sushchenko, O., Mitkov, M, Pohuda, N. (2023). Comparative Measurement of Intellectual Potential in Economiсs of Ukraine and Romania. Access to science, business, innovation in the digital economy, ACCESS Press, 4(2), 278-296, https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2023.4.2(9)
References:
-
Aidis, R., Krupickaitė, D., Blinstrubaitė, L. (2005). The loss of intellectual potential: migration tendencies amongst university students in Lithuania. Geografija, 2, pp. 33-40
-
Anand, S., Sen, A. (1994). Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement, New York: United National Human Development Report Office
-
Bazylevych, V. (2008). Intelektualna vlasnist [Intellectual Property], Кiev: Znannya
-
Bounfour, A. (2003). The IC-dVal approach, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4 (3), pp. 396 – 412
-
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2017). Plan dii shchodo implementatsii Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu ta Yevropeiskyi Soiuz [Action Plan for the implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and EU] (retrieved from https://minjust.gov.ua/eurointergration/plan_zahodiv)
-
Chuhno, А. (2003). Informatsiina postindustrialna ekonomika: teoriia i praktyka [Information Postindustrial Economy: Theory and Practice], Кiev: Logos
-
Dyachenko, Yu., Nenkov, N., Petrova, M., Skarga-Bandurova, I., Soloviov, O. (2018). Approaches to Cognitive Architecture of Autonomous Intelligent Agent. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, Elsevier, Volume 26, Pages 130-135, DOI:10.1016/j.bica.2018.10.004.
-
Drucker, P. (2006). Peter Drucker on the Profession of Management. Translated from English, М.: Williams
-
Edvinsson, L., Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital, European Management Journal, 4 (4), pp. 356-364
-
Eurostat (2019). Intellectual property (retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu)
-
Fassman, H., Munz, R. (2002). EU Enlargement and Future East-West Migration, New Challenges for Migration Policy in Central and Eastern Europe. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-6704-531-5_4
-
Fedulova, L. (2009). Ekonomika znan [Economy of Knowledge], Кiev: Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences
-
Gavkalova, N., Markova, N. (2006). Formuvannia ta vykorystannia intelektualnoho kapitalu: naukove vydannia [Formation and Use of the Intellectual Capital: scientific publication], Kharkiv: KhNEU Publishing House
-
Herman, E. (2019). Employment and Wages in the Pablic Sector in Romania in the European Context, Curentul Juridic, 76 (1), pp. 133-144
-
Iancu, V. (2014). Romania in the Context of European Innovation and Marketing of Intellectual Output, Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, pp. 380 – 387
-
Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (1997). The balanced scorecard, Boston: Harvard Business School Press
-
Kim, S., Yoon, Y., Kim, B., Lee, B., Kang, H. (2006). Knowledge-based Economy and Intellectual Capital: The Impact of National Intellectual and Information Capitals on Economic Growth in Korea, International Journal of Business and Information, 1 (1), pp. 28-52
-
Labra, L., Sánchez, M. (2013). National intellectual capital assessment models: A literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(4). DOI:10.1108/JIC-11-2012-0100
-
Labra, L., Sánchez, M. (2017). Intellectual capital of nations: a comparative analysis of assessment models, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15 (2), pp. 169-183
-
Lin, C., Edvinsson, L. (2011). National Intellectual Capital: A Comparison of 40 Countries, N.Y.: Springer
-
Message of the President of Ukraine to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2002). European Choice. Conceptual Framework Strategy for Economic and Social Development of Ukraine for 2002-2011, Кiev: Information and Publishing Centre of the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine
-
Michalczuk, G., Paszko, J. (2017). Kapitał intelektualny kraju (NIC) – konceptualizacja podejść [National intellectual capital (NIC) – the conceptualization of approach], Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 449, pp. 402-411. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2016.449.36
-
Michalczuk, G., Paszko, J. (2017). Macroeconomic Perspective of Intellectual Capital – National Intellectual Capital (NIC), Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 5 (89), pp. 117-133. DOI: 10.15290/ose.2017.05.89.08
-
Michalczuk, G., Fiedorczuk, J. (2017). Macroeconomic Perspective of Intellectual Capital (NIC), Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 1, pp. 117-133. DOI: 10.15290/ose.2017.05.89.08
-
Michalczuk, G., Fiedorczuk, J. (2018). Challenges of social accounting in the sphere of the measurement of national intellectual capital (NIC), Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, XXIII(25), pp. 205-217. DOI: 10.7862/rz.2018.hss.79
-
Mushkudiani, Z., Gechbaia, B., Gigauri, I., Gulua, E. 2020. Global, economic and technological trends in human resource management development. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 1(1): 53-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2020.1.1(4)
-
National Institute of Statistic (2019). Romanian Statistic Yeabook 2019 (retrieved fromhttps://insse.ro/cms/en/content/statistical-yearbooks-romania)
-
Odinokova, T., Akhmedyarov, Ye. (2022). Development of innovation activity research model and its implementation. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 3(1): 29-42. DOI:10.46656/access.2022.3.1(3)
-
Odotyuk, I. (2009). Technological Structure of the Industry of Ukraine: Realities and Prospects of Development, Кiev: Institute for Economics and Forecasting
-
O'Donnell, D., O'Regan, P., Coates, B. (2000). Intellectual Capital: A Habermasian Introduction, The Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1 (2), pp. 187-200. DOI: 10.1108/14691930010377496
-
O’Regan P., D. O’Donnell, (2000). Mapping Intellectual Resources: Insights from Critical Modernism, Journal of European Industrial Training, 24 (6)
-
Paszko, J. (2016). Significance of Skandia Achievements in the Development of Approaches to Conceptualization and Assessment Models of National Intellectual Capital, Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 5 (83), pp. 17-30. DOI: 10.15290/ose.2016.05.83.02
-
Petrova, M., Tepavicharova, M., Dikova, L. (2019). Economic and management analysis of the impact of human capital on the development of machinery-building in Bulgaria. Sheregesh, X International Scientific and Practical Conference “Innovations in Mechanical Engineering” (ISPCIME-2019). MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, vol.297 (06015), 2019, DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201929706015.
-
Ramazanov, S. Petrova, M. (2020). Development management and forecasting in a green innovative economy based on the integral dynamics model in the conditions of «Industry - 4.0». Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy. ACCESS Press, 1(1): 9-30. DOI:10.46656/access.2020.1.1(1)
-
Schifirnet, C. (2013). The Intellectual's State in the Context of the Romanian Society's Europeanization, Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 1 (2), pp. 293-315
-
Seitzhanov, S., Kurmanov, N., Petrova, M., Aliyev, U., Aidargaliyeva, N. (2020). Stimulation of entrepreneurs’ innovative activity: evidence from Kazakhstan. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2615-2629. DOI:10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(4)
-
Shumska, S. (2007). Intelektualnyi kapital u natsionalnomu ta mizhnarodnomu vymirakh [Intellectual Capital in National and International Dimensions], Кiev: Feniks
-
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine (2010). Naukova ta innovatsiina diialnist v Ukraini: statystychnyi zbirnyk [Scientific and Innovation Activities in Ukraine: statistical compilation], Кiev: State Statistics Committee of Ukraine
-
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine (2018). Statystychnyi daidzhest Ukrainy za 2019 rik [Statistical Digest of Ukraine for the year 2019], Кiyv: SE “Information and Analytical Agency”
-
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine (2018). Social Indicators of Living Standards of the Population: statistical compilation, Кiev: Information and Analytical Agency
-
Statistics Poland (2021). Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland, Warsaw: Statistical publishing establishment
-
Svarc, J., Lažnjak, J., Dabic, M. (2020). The role of national intellectual capital in the digital transformation of EU countries. Another digital divide?, Journal of Intellectual Capital, DOI:10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0024
-
Sveiby, K-E. (1997). The new organisational wealth, Berret-Koehler: San Francisco
-
Titu, A., Oprean, C., Raulea, A. (2015). The management of Intellectual Property in Romanian State University where Research Represents a Strength, Acta Universitatis Cibiniencis -Technical Series, LXVI, DOI: 10.1515/aucts-2015-0049
-
Ukrainian Society (2005). Intehratsiia intelektualnoho potentsialu [Integration of the Intellectual Potential], Кiyv: National Academy of Sciences
-
United Nations Development Programme (2010). Human Development Report 2010. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development, New York: Palgrave Macmillan
-
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2014). Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom [Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union] (retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011?lang=en#Text)
-
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1999). Pro kontseptsii naukovo-tekhnichnoho ta innovatsiinoho rozvytku Ukrainy [On Concepts of Scientific-Technological and Innovation Development of Ukraine] (retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/916-14#Text)
-
World Intellectual Property Organization (2016). Global Innovation Index 2016 (retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4064)
-
World Intellectual Property Organization (2017). Global Innovation Index 2017 (retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/ru/details.jsp?id=4193)
-
World Intellectual Property Organization (2018). Global Innovation Index 2018 (retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/ru/details.jsp?id=4330)
