Access Journal

Access to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy

Ownership rights on intermediated securities

Published Online: Jul 1, 2022
Published: Sep 30, 2022
Views: 1260
Downloads: 93
Download PDF

The article is devoted to the contemporary problems of the ownership rights on intermediated securities. Authors study ownership rights as well as reviews the models of the proprietary rights in the modern holding chains and models of the securities holding systems, such as direct, indirect and mixed. Then author reviews the multi-tiered system of intermediation holding and proprietary rights in it under the discourse of the Latvian law, which stays on the position of the individual ownership model. This model contemplates that the end-investor has complete ownership on the securities and argues that ownership rights on intermediated securities, which are confirmed by the intermediary to the end investor under Latvian approach is a current legal fiction. Objectives: The study aims at continuing development of the securities law theory, while its task is to characterise the ownership rights on intermediated securities from the point of view of Latvian law and practice. Methods/Approach Scientific research methods – both comparative and analytical – is used in the process of drawing up of this article. Results: Authors come to conclusion that the scope of the rights confirmed by intermediary is narrower than scope of the “classic” legal ownership rights.) as well as states that the type of account is the additional attribute which allows to determine the status of the proprietary rights on securities entered in. The legal fiction of the “ownership” on intermediated securities is created to eliminate too complex descriptions of underlying rights and to simplify the description of the transaction, applying clear and understandable simple structures such as sale purchase or repo.
JEL Classification:
K11, K15, K22
How to cite:
Jukna, T., Grasis, J. (2022) Ownership rights on intermediated securities. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 3(3): 206-220.
  • Alférez, F. (2006) The UNIDROIT Project on Intermediated Securities: Direct and Indirect Holding Systems, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos of Madrid, 2006 available at accessed on 20 April 2022
  • American Law Institute & National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. (2009). Uniform commercial code: Official text and comments : including Article 1 (General Provisions), Article 2 (Sales), Article 2A (Leases), Article 3 (Negotiable Instruments), Article 4 (Bank Deposits and Collections), Article 4A (Funds Transfers), Article 5 (Letters of Credit), Article 6 (Bulk Sales), Article 7 (Documents of Title), Article 8 (Investment Securities), Article 9 (Secured Transactions), Article 10 (Effective Date and Repealer), Article 11 (Effective Date and Transition Provisions), Appendices, Index. St. Paul, Minn.: West., Cited as UCC.
  • Boyte, A. (2014) The Concept of our legal imagination: legal fictions and the concept of deemed authorship, Legislation and public policy, Vol 17: p.707-762 accessed on 20 April 2022
  • Chun, C. (2012) “Intermediated System in the United States” [in] Cross Border Transaction of Intermediated Securities: a Comparative Analysis in Substantive Law and Private International law, Springer Berlin, 2012, ISBN 978-3-642-27852-5, pp. 197-248
  • Civillikums. (1937) Civil Law: Latvian law (1937, February 20). Valdības Vēstnesis, 175 [In Latvian]
  • Donald, D. (2005) ‘The voice of shareholders and its opponents’. Institute for Law and Finance Working Paper Series No 40 (2005) accessed 20 April 2022.
  • European Comission. (2011) Legislation on legal certainity of securities holding and dispositions, 2011, accessed on 22 April 2022
  • FATF. (2009) Money Laundering and terrorist Financing in Securities Sector, accessed on 21 April 2022
  • Finanšu instrumentu tirgus likums (2003) Financial Instrument Market Law: Latvian law (2001, November 23). Latvijas Vēstnesis, 175 [In Latvian].
  • Gardner A., (2011) A. Black’s law dictionary, 4-th ed, West, 2011, USA, ISBN 978-0-314-27544-8 p.466
  • Grasis, J. (2008) Trasta būtība, tā atzīšana un tiesiskais regulējums romāņu ģermāņu tiesību saimes valstīs un iespējamā pārņemšana Latvijā (The Essence of Trusts, its Recognition and Legal Regulation in the Roman – German Law System Countries and Possible Introduction in Latvia), Dissertation paper, University of Latvia, 2008.,pp. 110-160 accessed on 25 April 2022 [In Latvian].
  • Mooney, C. (2019) Global Standards for Securities Holding Infrastructures: A Soft Law/Fintech Model for Reform , Michigan Journal of International Law, Forthcoming U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 19-05, 2019, accessed on 21 April 2022
  • Nie F. & Bagheri M. (2021) A comparison of investors’ protection in different securities holding systems and the legal implications of direct and indirect holding: a focus on China’s central securities depository legal position, Capital Markets Law Journal, Volume 16, Issue 2, April 2021, p.p. 187–202,
  • Regulation No 909 (2014), Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 Text with EEA relevance, OV L 257, 28.8.2014., 1./72. p.
  • Schwartz, S. & Benjamin J. (2002) Intermediary risk in the inderect holding system for securities, Duke Journal of Comparative & International law, Vol 12, pp 309-330 accessed on 21 April 2022
  • UNIDROIT. (2017) Legislative Guide on intermediated securities, 2017 accessed on 21 April 2022

Publish your science journal

If you like ACCESS journals system, you can publish your journal with us at a reasonable price