Transformation of Georgia’s trade policy strategy: from frailty to sustainability
Published Online: Jan 30, 2022
Published: Jan 31, 2022
Email:
giga.abuseridze@rsu.lv
Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
Email:
m.petrova@ts.uni-vt.bg
St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Information Systems Management Institute (ISMA), Riga, Latvia
Email:
vitolds.zahars@inbox.lv
Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia
Email:
vladas.tumalavicius@lka.lt
General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania
Views: 2727
Downloads: 157
Download PDF
Abstract:
The following article reviews the trade policies and practices of Georgia as well as Georgia-WTO relationship. The authors focus on Georgia’s recent economic performance, including Association Agreement (AA) with the European Union that contributed powerfully to stabilising Georgia's trade legislation and reinforcing domestic economic reform. The Association Agreement between Georgia and the European Union and its member States aims at Georgia's gradual economic integration into the EU Internal Market, through the establishment of the DCFTA, which should provide for far-reaching market access based on sustained and regulatory approximation.
The study reveals the importance of the World Trade Organization, main trade agreements and arrangements with Georgia as a developing country. It demonstrates that effective trade stabilization in the WTO can be achieved by the implementation of specific WTO’s regulations on trade, economic and legal spheres.
One of the reasons for the special success of the WTO is systemic exceptions for developed countries and states with special needs (country like Georgia) that contributes to the development of international trade through progressive liberalization and the comparative advantage of the states when carrying out trade.
The example of Georgia shows very well that so far the country has not been able to actively apply all the advantages that can be used within the framework of international or regional organizations, at least for the simple reason that the country does not possess the appropriate infrastructure for bringing innovative products to foreign markets, and thus accumulate more economic wealth.
This case study evidences and confirms that while the accession process to the WTO is challenging per se, it is part of a process of domestic reforms that triggers growth and economic benefits.
Keywords:
JEL Classification:
F13, F02, K33
How to cite:
Abuseridze, G., Petrova, M., Zahars, V., Tumalavicius, V. (2022). Transformation of Georgia’s trade policy strategy: from frailty to sustainability. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 3(1): 43-52. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2022.3.1(4)
References:
-
Abuseridze, G (2020). Trade War: Georgia vs. Russia. Electronic Scientific Journal of Law Socrates. January 2020; SOCRATES Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls / SOCRATES Rīga Stradiņš University Faculty of Law Electronic Scientific Journal of Law 3(18):147-154. DOI:10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.147-154
-
Baklanova, O., Petrova, M., Koval, V. (2020). Institutional transmission in economic development, Ikonomicheski Izsledvania (Economic Studies), 29(1), pp. 68-91
-
Broadman, Harry G. (2005) From Disintegration to Reintegration: Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union in International Trade. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7511 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.// http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7511
-
European Commission (2021). EU-Georgia Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/eu-georgia-deep-and-comprehensive-free-trade-area
-
Georgian National Investment Agency (2021). Favorable Tax Regimes in the Country. https://www.pwc.com/ge/en/assets/pdf/june-2021/DBG%202021_as%20of%2031%20March%202021.pdf
-
International Monetary Fund (2018). IMF Country Report. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2018/eng/
-
Matyushenko, I., Hlibko, S., Petrova, M., Khanova, O., Loktionova, M., Trofimchenko, K. (2021). Assessment of technological competitiveness of Ukraine in terms of association with the EU. Ikonomicheski Izsledvania (Economic Studies), ISSN 02053292, 30(7), pp. 148-176
-
Matyushenko, I., Hlibko, S., Petrova, M. M., Pasmor, M. S., & Loktionova, M. (2020). Assessment of the development of foreign trade in high-tech production of Ukraine under the association with the EU. Business, Management and Education, 18(1), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2020.11578
-
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2018). Georgia - The outlook. https://www.mof.ge/images/File/Georgia-The-Outlook_ENG_Apr-2018.pdf
-
Smeets, M. (2013). Trade Capacity Building in the WTO: Main Achievements since Doha and Key Challenges. Journal of World Trade. Volume 47, Issue 5, pp.1047–1090, https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/ Journal+of+World+Trade/47.5/TRAD2013035
-
World Bank (2018). Doing Business 2019: A Year of Record Reforms, Rising Influence. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2018/10/31/doing-business-2019-a-year-of-record-reforms-rising-influence
-
World Bank (2014). Annual Report. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/AR14_OperationalHigh lights.pdf
-
WTO Secretariat (2015). Trade Policy Review, Report by Georgia, WT/TPR/G/328. (15-5924). Page: 1/13. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/s328_e.pdf
-
World Trade Organization (1999). WTO Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Georgia to the World Trade Organization WT/ACC/GEO/31. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=Q:/WT/ACC/ GEO31.pdf&Open=True