Access Journal

Access to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy

Legal instruments how to involve end user or public in the public procurement contract adaptation to future needs

Published Online: Jul 15, 2023
Views: 765
Downloads: 33
Download PDF

Abstract:
For procurement items with a long life cycle, it is very important to be able to achieve the efficiency of the result not only at the moment of acceptance of the performance, but also during its entire life cycle. Because in such a changing and dynamic development of the world, as it is now, it is impossible today to accurately predict the needs of the future consumer, or society. Thus, to ensure efficiency, it is essential that the customer has the opportunity to impact the execution of the contract not only during the procurement planning phase, but also during the life cycle of the procurement item. It is even more important not only in the procurement planning phase, but also during its implementation to ensure compliance of the performance with the needs and interests of the existing end users, or society. In practice, various ways are used to influence or amend the direction of execution of a civil contract, depending on whether the traditional public procurement or the Public-Private partnership (hereinafter - PPP) procedure is applied. The purpose of the study is to reveal the practical and legal aspects of how the end user, or society, can be involved in decision-making related to changes or additional works necessary for the effectiveness of the contract, thus ensuring their compliance with real-time needs. Methods/Approach The methodology of the research includes a conceptual research using the critical literature review, analysis of normative, evaluation of the dominant consensus, synthesis of possible solutions to legal and practical shortcomings of end user involvement in public resources spending procedures. Results: Authors come to conclusion that the involvement of the public through NGOs is essential so that its interests are taken into account throughout the procurement subject during the life cycle and it would also be possible to introduce innovations based on the needs of the society throughout the contract execution period. Reasonable way how to involve the end user (society) as a participant during whole life cycle of public procurement contract for to be able to contract adaptation for future needs could be PPP based on QHC – where institutional partnership includes NGO as representative of society.
Keywords:
Pages:
375-386
JEL Classification:
K0, K4, K12, H57
How to cite:
Avena, L.; Grasis, J. (2023). Legal instruments how to involve end user or public in the public procurement contract adaptation to future needs. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 4(3): 375-386. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2023.4.3(3)
References:
  • Agrawal A., Catalini Ch., Goldfarb A. (2014). Finland Simple Economics of Crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol.14, p.63-97. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/674021
  • Alvarez S., Rubio A. (2015). Carbon Footprint in Green Public Procurement: A Case Study in the Services Sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.93, p.159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.048
  • Avena L. (2019). The social responsibility as an assessment component within the public procurement process. Proceedings of the 61th International Scientific Conference of Daugavpils University. Part B “Social Sciences”. Daugavpils: Daugavpils Universitāte, ISSN 2500- 9842, ISSN 2500-9869, ISBN 978-9984-14-900-4. p. 228-233
  • Bala A., Muñoz P., Rieradevall J., Ysern P. (2008). Experiences with Greening Suppliers. The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona’. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.16, p.1610-1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.015
  • Belleflamme P., Lambert T., Schwienbacher A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing. Volume 29, Issue 5, 2014, p.585-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
  • Bommert B. (2014). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1), p. 15–33. https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/73
  • Boudreau K.J., Jeppesen L., Reichstein T., Rolls F. (2015). Crowdfunding as 'Donations‘: Theory & Evidence. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No.16-038, Pages 37. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=49831
  • Bratt C., Hallstedt S., Robèrt K.-H., Broman G., Oldmark J. (2013). Assessment of Criteria Development for Public Procurement from a Strategic Sustainability Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 52, p.309-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.007
  • Burtch G., Anindya G., Sunil W. (2013). An Empirical Examination of the Antecedent and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets. Information Systems Research. 40 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1928168
  • Byggeth S., Hochschorner E. (2006). Handling Trade-Offs in Ecodesign Tools for Sustainable Product Development and Procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, Issues 15–16, p.1420-1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024
  • Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1997) // "Latvijas Vēstnesis", 143/144, 13.06.1997
  • de Vries H., Bekkers V., Tummers L. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, vol. 94 (1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
  • Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council // Official Journal of the European Union 28.03.2014 L94/65
  • Gasco ́M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), p. 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
  • Hannon M.J., Foxon T. J., Gale W.F. (2015). Demand Pull” Government Policies to Support Product-Service System Activity: The Case of Energy Service Companies (ESCos) in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 108, part A, p.900-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.082
  • Hartley J., Sørensen E., Torfing J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review 73(6), p.821-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
  • Holmström B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1 p.74-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
  • Hong S., Lee S. (2018). Adaptive governance and decentralization: Evidence from regulation of the sharing economy in multi-level governance. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 35, Issue 2, p.299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.002
  • Hong S., Ryu J. (2019). Crowdfunding public projects: Collaborative governance for achieving citizen co-funding of public goods. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 36, Issue 1, p.145-153, ISSN 0740-624X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.009
  • Igarashi M. de Boer L., Michelsen O. (2015). Investigating the Anatomy of Supplier Selection in Green Public Procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.108, part A. p.442-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.010
  • Jukna, T., Grasis, J. (2023). Investor protection: segregation of assets. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 4(2): p.168-181. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2023.4.2(2)
  • Law on procurement of public service providers // “Latvijas Vēstnesis”, 36, 16.02.2017
  • Lindsay C., Findlay P., McQuarrie J., Bennie M., Dunlop Corcoran, E., Van Der Meer R. (2018). Collaborative Innovation, New Technologies, and Work Redesign. Public Administration Review, Volume 78, Issue 2, p.251-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12843
  • Liu X., Cui Q (2016). Assessing the Impacts of Preferential Procurement on LowCarbon Building. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112, part 1, p.863-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.015
  • Melissen F., Reinders H. (2012). A Reflection on the Dutch Sustainable Public Procurement Programme. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, vol.9, p.27-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2012.658815
  • Mollick E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 29, Issue 1, p.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
  • Mosgaard M., Riisgaard H., Huulgaard R.D. (2013). Greening Non-Product-Related Procurement – When Policy Meets Reality. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.39, p.137-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.018
  • Nenkov, N.V., Petrova M.M., Dyachenko, Yu. (2016) “Intelligence Technologies in Management and Administration of Justice” SGEM 2016. VOL V Book Series: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts, p. 385-392. DOI: 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/B25/S07.050
  • Shen L, Zhang Zh., Zhang X. (2017). Key Factors Affecting Green Procurement in Real Estate Development: A China Study. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.153, p.372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.021
  • Smith J., Andersson G., Gourlay R., Karner S., Mikkelsen B.E., Sonnino R., Barling D. (2016). Balancing Competing Policy Demands: The Case of Sustainable Public Sector Food Procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.112, part 1, p.249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.065
  • Stoughton M., Votta T.J. (2003). Implementing Service-Based Chemical Procurement: Lessons and Results. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.11, issue 8, p.839-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00159-2
  • Testa F., Annunziata E., Iraldo F., Frey M. (2016). Drawbacks and Opportunities of Green Public Procurement: An Effective Tool for Sustainable Production. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol.112, part 3, p.1893-1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.092
  • Thomson J., Jackson T. (2007). Sustainable Procurement in Practice: Lessons from Local Government. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol.50, issue 3, p.421-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701261695
  • Torgan K., Karklin J., Mantroy V., Rasnacs L. (2020). Contract Law in Latvia. Kluwer Law International BV, Netherlands, p.53
  • UN Environment-Global review of sustainable public procurement (2017) p.112. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/20919/GlobalReview_Sust_Procurement.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed= (accessed on march 2023)
  • Uttam K., Le Lann Roos C. (2015). Competitive Dialogue Procedure for Sustainable Public Procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.86, p.403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.031
  • Varnäs A., Balfors B., Faith-Ell Ch. (2009). Environmental Consideration in Procurement of Construction Contracts: Current Practice, Problems and Opportunities in Green Procurement in the Swedish Construction Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.17, issue 13, p.1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.001
  • Velve (now Avena) L., (2016). Multidisciplināras pieejas aspekti kvalitātes jēdziena izpratnei publiskā iepirkumā” Starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences “Sociālās zinātnes reģionālajai attīstībai 2016” II daļa: VALSTS UN TIESĪBU AKTUĀLĀS PROBLĒMAS (ISSN 2255-8853), p.236-245 (in LV)
  • Walker H., Preuss L. (2008). Fostering Sustainability through Sourcing from Small Businesses: Public Sector Perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, volume16, issue 15, p.1600-1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014
  • Witjes S., Lozano R. (2016). Towards a More Circular Economy: Proposing a Framework Linking Sustainable Public Procurement and Sustainable Business Models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 112, p.37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015

Publish your science journal

If you like ACCESS journals system, you can publish your journal with us at a reasonable price