Access Journal

Access to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy

Multifactor models for studying the impact of investment activities of enterprises on their profitability: case of Ukraine

Published Online: Oct 24, 2022
Published: Jan 31, 2023
Views: 1115
Downloads: 65
Download PDF

Abstract:
Objectives: Understanding the processes of transformation of the investment activity of domestic business entities is decisive, when making decisions and forming effective scenarios for the further development of business activities aimed at increasing profits. There are complex economic realities for the development of production today, so, the economic agents are faced with the task of finding the optimal ratio between investments in the production restructuring processes and investments in innovative projects. This problem can be solved only by forming the optimal structure of their own capital investments. The purpose of this study is to identify the main trends in the investment activity of domestic enterprises using a comprehensive analysis of the structural dynamics of real investment projects and its impact on their financial results. Methods / Approach: During the analysis of investment process, relative indicators that characterize the shares of the components in the structure of the investments were calculated; charts and graphs were constructed, analytical tables were compiled. Multifactor linear regression models were built to determine the importance of the investment components’ dominance and their impact on the profitability of the enterprise. Canonical correlation analysis was used to study the relationship between financial performance indicators of Ukrainian enterprises and using the high technologies in their production activities. Results: It was found that the dynamics of indicators that identify structural and dynamic changes in the structure of capital investments of Ukrainian enterprises and the selection of certain structural regimes indicate the dependence of the rate of growth and structural shifts on the political situation in the country, as well as on the coronavirus pandemic, which caused significant fluctuations in the investment activity of domestic business entities. Conclusions: The study confirmed that the indicator of the financial performance of Ukrainian enterprises is most influenced gross investment in existing buildings and structures, gross investment in construction and alteration of buildings and gross investment in purchased software.
Keywords:
Pages:
7-23
JEL Classification:
C50, M21, D92
How to cite:
Dziubanovska, N., Maslii, V., Lytvyn, Z. (2023). Multifactor models for studying the impact of investment activities of enterprises on their profitability: case of Ukraine.. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 4(1): 7-23. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2023.4.1(1)
References:
  • Čámská, D., Kula D. (2011). Investment Activity and its Postponing in the Czech Republic in the Crisis Period. Scientific Conference «Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education». January, 2011. p. 70-81. ISBN 978-609-457-015-5. DOI: 10.3846/cibme.2011.06
  • Čámská, D., Klecka, J. (2012). Investment Activities of Business and the Use of European Financial Support in the Czech Republic at the Time of Crisis. Theoretical and Applied Economics. Vol.XIX. No. 4(569). p. 17-30.
  • Corrado, C., Haltiwanger, J. & Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Framework, in Corrado, C., Haltiwanger, J. & Sichel, D. (eds), Measuring Capital in the New Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 11–46.
  • Corrado, C., Hulten, C. and Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible capital and economic growth, The Review of Income and Wealth 55(3), 661-685.
  • Crass, D., Licht, G., & Peters, B. (2010). Intangible Assets and Investments at the Sector Level – Empirical Evidence for Germany. Discussion Paper No. 14-049. Retrieved from http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp14049.pdf
  • Delbecque, V. and Nayman, L. (2010). Measuring intangible capital investment: An application to the French data. Working Papers. 2010-19, CEPII Research Center, Paris.
  • Demirhan, D., Jacob, V.S. & Raghunathan, S. (2005/2006) Information Technology Investment Strategies under Declining Technology Cost. Journal of Management Information Systems. Vol. 22, No. 3. 321-350.
  • Dziubanovska N. Multifactor models for studying the EU countries’ international trade. Economic Annals-XXI. 2019. Vol. 175 (1–2), P. 29–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-05.
  • Edquist, H. (2011). Can Investment in Intangibles Explain the Swedish Productivity Boom in the 1990s?, Review of Income and Wealth. 57(4), 658-682.
  • Fukao, K., Miyagawa, T., Mukai, K., Shinoda, Y. and Tonogi, K. (2009). Intangible Investment in Japan: Measurement and Contribution to Economic Growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 717– 736.
  • Goodridge, P., Haskel, J. & Wallis, G. (2012). UK Innovation Index: Productivity and Growth in UK Industries, CEPR Discussion Papers 9063, London.
  • Hao, J., Manole, V. and van Ark, B. (2009). Intangible Capital and Growth – an International Comparison, Coinvest Deliverable D3.6: Paper quantifying figures on time-series estimates dating back to 1980 for Germany, Brussels.
  • Jędrzejczak-Gas, J., Barska, A. & Bánociová, A. (2018). The Investment Activity of Companies in Poland by Industry. Management. Vol.22. 141-157. DOI:10.2478/manment-2018-0028
  • Methodological provisions of the state statistical survey on capital investments. Kyiv. 2021. 21 p. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/norm_doc/2021/288/288.pdf
  • National Bank of Ukraine (2020) Retrieved from: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/markets/exchangerates [accessed 2 August 2022]
  • Opic, S. (2019). Advantages and Limitations of Linear Canonical Correlation Analysis (LCCA). 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. Seville, Spain. 11-13 November, 2019. p. 6332-6338, ISBN 978-84-09-14755-7. DOI: 10.21125/iceri.2019.1527, https://library.iated.org/view/OPIC2019ADV
  • Piątkowski, M.J. (2020). Analysis of Investment Activities of Enterprises in Poland. Entrepreneurship - Education. 16(2). 225-238. doi.org/10.24917/20833296.162.18
  • Piątkowski, M.J. (2020). Results of SME Investment Activities: A Comparative Analysis among Enterprises Using and Not Using EU Subsidies in Poland. Administrative Sciences, MDPI. Vol.10 (1), 1-26. doi.org/10.3390/admsci10010004
  • Ramazanov, S., Antoshkina, L., Babenko, V., & Akhmedov, R. (2019). Integrated model of stochastic dynamics for control of a socio-ecological-oriented innovation economy. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 7(2), 763-773. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i2.557
  • State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2022) Retrieved from: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [accessed 2 August 2022]
  • Wildowicz-Giegel, A. (2013). Investment Priorities and the Innovation of Enterprises in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 4(1), 65–77. doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2013.005

Publish your science journal

If you like ACCESS journals system, you can publish your journal with us at a reasonable price