Access Journal

Access to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy
The journal uses continuous publication model. Current issue is in progress.
Published Online: Aug 11, 2026

Organizational values and corporate social responsibility perceptions: evidence from Vietnamese agricultural enterprises

Published Online: Aug 11, 2026
Views: 247
Downloads: 19
Download PDF

Abstract:
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become increasingly important for agricultural enterprises as they face growing environmental, social, and market pressures associated with globalization, sustainability standards, and new-generation free trade agreements. Although previous studies have recognized the importance of organizational values in promoting CSR, limited empirical evidence explains how individual values and corporate culture jointly shape CSR perceptions in agricultural enterprises within emerging economies. This study investigates the influence of personal values and corporate culture on CSR perceptions among Vietnamese agricultural enterprises. Using survey data collected from 183 agricultural enterprises and cooperatives in Binh Duong Province, Vietnam, the study applies Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine the relationships between organizational values and CSR perceptions across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. This study tests are further employed to assess differences in CSR perceptions according to enterprise age and export orientation. The findings reveal that both personal values and corporate culture positively and significantly influence CSR perceptions; however, corporate culture consistently exerts a stronger effect across all three CSR dimensions, particularly with respect to environmental responsibility. In addition, enterprises with longer operating histories and export orientation demonstrate significantly stronger CSR perceptions than younger and non-export-oriented firms. These findings extend the CSR literature by integrating individual values and corporate culture into a unified analytical framework, demonstrating that organizational culture constitutes the primary mechanism through which CSR awareness is translated into organizational practice. The study also provides practical implications for enterprise managers and policymakers by suggesting that strengthening CSR-oriented corporate culture, embedding CSR into strategic management, investing in employee value development, and promoting supportive policy incentives can enhance sustainable competitiveness and facilitate deeper integration into international agricultural markets.
Keywords:
Pages:
621-642
JEL Classification:
M14, Q13, Q56
How to cite:
Thang, N.C., Binh, D.T., Hung, B.V., Ha, V.T., Duc, D.M. (2026). Organizational values and corporate social responsibility perceptions: evidence from Vietnamese agricultural enterprises. Access to science, business, innovation in the digital economy, ACCESS Press 7(3), 621-642, https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2026.7.3(7)
References:
  • Agle, B. R., & Caldwell, C. B. (1999). Understanding research on values in business. Business & Society, 38(3), 326–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800305
  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631143607
  • Allen, G. W., Attoh, P. A., & Gong, T. (2017). Transformational leadership and affective organizational commitment: mediating roles of perceived social responsibility and organizational identification. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(3), 585-600. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-11-2016-0193
  • Anthony Wong, I., & Hong Gao, J. (2014). Exploring the direct and indirect effects of CSR on organizational commitment: The mediating role of corporate culture. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,26(4), 500-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2013-0225
  • Azuaje, E. P. (2021). Transformational Leadership, Ethical Professional Practice, Corporate Culture Influence and Their Relationship to Nonprofit Leaders’ Performance, Trevecca Nazarene University
  • Baucus, M. S., & Beck-Dudley, C. L. (2005). Designing ethical organizations: Avoiding the long-term negative effects of rewards and punishments. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 355-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1033-8
  • Brunton, M., Eweje, G., & Taskin, N. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility to internal stakeholders: Walking the walk or just talking the talk?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 31-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.1889
  • Budur, T., & Demir, A. (2019). Leadership effects on employee perception about CSR in Kurdistan Region of Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(4), 184-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i4p184
  • Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and responsibility: creating value for business, society and the environment. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2(1), 59-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41180-017-0016-5
  • Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the COVID-19 pandemic: Organizational and managerial implications. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(3), 315-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jsma-07-2021-0145
  • Chaudhary, R. (2021). Authentic leadership and meaningfulness at work: role of employees' CSR perceptions and evaluations. Management Decision, 59(8), 2024-2039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2019-0271
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  • De Roeck, K., & Farooq, O. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Investigating their interactive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 923-939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3656-6
  • Del Baldo, M. (2017). Authentic CSR and leadership: Towards a virtues-Based model of stakeholder dialogue and engagement. The Loccioni Group Experience. Stages of corporate social responsibility: From ideas to impacts, 179-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43536-7_9
  • Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of management review, 32(3), 901-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275682
  • Dermol, V., & Širca, N. T. (2018). Communication, company mission, organizational values, and company performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 542-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.034
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  • Doh, J. P., & Quigley, N. R. (2014). Responsible leadership and stakeholder management: Influence pathways and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Perspectives,28(3), 255-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0013
  • Dolan, S. L., Garcia, S., & Richley, B. (2006). Managing by Values: Its Foundation and Evolution. In: Managing by Values. Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: 10.1057/9780230597754_1
  • Dyczkowska, J., Krasodomska, J., & Robertson, F. (2022). The role of integrated reporting in communicating adherence to stakeholder capitalism principles during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meditari accountancy research, 30(7), 147-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0013
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance, Stanford University Press
  • Fordham, A. E., & Robinson, G. M. (2019). Identifying the social values driving corporate social responsibility. Sustainability Science, 14, 1409-1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00720-w
  • Foscht, T., Lin, Y., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2018). Blinds up or down? The influence of transparency, future orientation, and CSR on sustainable and responsible behavior. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3/4), 476-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2016-0576
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman. 276 pages
  • Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in psychology, Vol.7, 796. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796
  • Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of business ethics, 55, 223-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1275-5
  • Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Black, W. C., (2022). Multivariate Data Analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. 832 p
  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 50, 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:busi.0000020964.80208.c9
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific journal of management, 1, 81-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01733682
  • Hood, J. N. (2003). The relationship of leadership style and CEO values to ethical practices in organizations. Journal of Business ethics, 43(4), 263-273. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074998
  • Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International journal of management reviews, 20(1), 32-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
  • Jiang, W., Wu, J., & Yang, X. (2023). Does digitization drive corporate social responsibility?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 14-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.010
  • Jin, K. G., & Drozdenko, R. G. (2010). Relationships among perceived organizational core values, corporate social responsibility, ethics, and organizational performance outcomes: An empirical study of information technology professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 341-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0158-1
  • Jnaneswar, K., & Ranjit, G. (2020). Effect of transformational leadership on job performance: testing the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Advances in Management Research,17(5), 605-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jamr-05-2020-0068
  • Kallmuenzer, A., Kraus, S., Bouncken, R., & Reinwald, D. (2023). Ecological and social sustainable change through corporate social responsibility: The enabling role of employees. Strategic Change, 32(4-5), 153-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2551
  • Kang, J., & Hustvedt, G. (2014). Building trust between consumers and corporations: The role of consumer perceptions of transparency and social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 125, 253-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1916-7
  • Kim, S. (2019). The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers’ CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. Journal of business ethics, 154(4), 1143-1159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6
  • Kim, Y., & Kim, S. Y. (2010). The influence of cultural values on perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s dimensions to Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of business ethics, 91, 485-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0095-z
  • Klymenko, O., & Lillebrygfjeld Halse, L. (2022). Sustainability practices during COVID-19: an institutional perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), 1315-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijlm-05-2021-0306
  • Lim, J. S., & Greenwood, C. A. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR): Stakeholder responsiveness and engagement strategy to achieve CSR goals. Public relations review, 43(4), 768-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.06.007
  • Ma, X., & Jiang, W. (2018). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and employee creativity in entrepreneurial firms. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(3), 302-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886318764346
  • Martínez, J. B., Fernández, M. L., & Fernández, P. M. R. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives. European journal of management and business economics, 25(1), 8-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002
  • Mason, C., Simmons, J. (2014). Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach. Journal of Business Ethics,119, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1615-9
  • Men, L. R. (2014). Strategic Internal Communication: Transformational Leadership, Communication Channels, and Employee Satisfaction: Transformational Leadership, Communication Channels, and Employee Satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 264-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318914524536
  • Mueller, K., Straatmann, T. (2014). Organizational Values. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2031
  • Nguyen, M., Khan, M., & Bensemann, J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in Vietnam: Systematic review of research and future directions. Society and Business Review, 17(1), 92-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sbr-09-2020-0114
  • Pham, H. S. T., & Tran, H. T. (2020). CSR disclosure and firm performance: The mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity. Journal of Business Research, 120, 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.002
  • Rokeach, M, 1973, The nature of human values, Philosophy, Free press. 438 pages
  • Sarfo, C. A., Zhang, J. A., O'Kane, P., Podgorodnichenko, N., & Osei-Fosu, K. K. (2022). Perceived corporate social responsibility and employee ethical behaviour: do employee commitment and co-worker ethicality matter? Journal of Management & Organization, 28(1), 184-201. Cambridge University Press
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 1-65. Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6
  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing
  • Tajfel, H., Turner, J. (200). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In M.J. Hatch, and M. Schultz (eds), I. The Roots of Organizational Identity in Sociology and Social Psychology, in M.J.Hatch, and M.Schultz (eds), Organizational Identity: A Reader, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005
  • Ullah, I., Hameed, R. M., Kayani, N. Z., & Fazal, Y. (2022). CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility: Examining the mediating role of organizational ethical culture and intellectual capital. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(1), 99-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.48
  • Williams, S. L. (2002). Strategic planning and organizational values: Links to alignment. Human Resource Development International, 5(2), 217-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13678860110057638
  • Zhao, J. (2021). Reimagining corporate social responsibility in the era of COVID-19: Embedding resilience and promoting corporate social competence. Sustainability, 13(12), 6548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126548

Publish your science journal

If you like ACCESS journals system, you can publish your journal with us at a reasonable price