Access Journal

Access to Science, Business, Innovation in the Digital Economy

Institutional dysfunctions as a factor of convergent-divergent institutional development of post-socialist countries

Published Online: Aug 31, 2021
Views: 151
Downloads: 12
Download PDF

The article examines the causes, nature and consequences of institutional dysfunctions that arise in the process of market transformations of post-socialist economies, as well as how they affect the institutional development of these countries. A comparative analysis was conducted on the conceptual and methodological basis of modern economic transitology and new institutional economics using such statistical methods as comparison of averages, graphical, correlation analysis, and clustering. The results of the analysis revealed the convergent-divergent nature of the institutional dysfunctions impact on institutional development of post-socialist countries. In particular, the similarity of changes in averages of such development indicators was observed, which indicates the existence of a cluster (convergent-divergent) relationship between 19 analyzed post-socialist countries during the second decade of the XXI century. The convergence of institutional development trends is determined both by the general strategic orientation of systemic market reforms and by the geopolitical, territorial proximity of countries, their membership in regional associations. Clustering of countries through the use of Euclidean distance found that due to differences in institutional development rates of post-socialist economies over the past ten years, the number of clusters has increased, indicating the divergent institutional development of these countries. It is due to the degree of congruence of the prevailing informal institutional environment in countries with the implemented institutional modernizations, which creates various complicating, inhibitory and contradictory institutional dysfunctions or traps that should become an object of further institutional reform.
JEL Classification:
В41, В52, С38, D02, Е02, О43, О57
How to cite:
Grazhevska, N., Gaidai, T., Mostepaniuk, A., Zavazhenko, A. (2021). Institutional dysfunctions as a factor of convergent-divergent institutional development of post-socialist countries. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 2(3): 290-308.
  • Balatsky, E.V. (2020), “Institutional Trap: Both a Productive Concept and a Fine Metaphor”, Journal of Institutional Studies, 12(3), pр. 24-41.
  • Beckert, J. (2010), “Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change”, Sociological Theory, Volume 28, Issue 2. Рр. 150-166.
  • Börzel, T. A., and Risse, T. (2016), “Dysfunctional state institutions, trust, and governance in areas of limited statehood”, Regulation & Governance, 10: 149– 160.
  • Corruption Perceptions Index Data. (accessed 01.08.2021)
  • Eggertsson, T. (2005), “Imperfect institutions: possibilities and limits of reform”, The University of Michigan Press, Michigan. 274 p.
  • Fragile State Index Data. URL: (accessed 01.08.2021)
  • Hartwell, Ch.A. (2015), “Institutional Reform: Irresistible Forces and Immovable Objects” in J. Hölscher & H. Tomann (eds) Palgrave Dictionary of Emerging Markets and Transition Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 589 р. pр. 153-169.
  • Hartwell, C. (2016). “Two Roads Diverge: The Transition Experience of Poland and Ukraine”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2006), “The Divergence of Institutional Change as a Style-Theoretic Phenomenon”, SSRN Electronic Journal, pр. 1-24.
  • Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2009), “Time, Style and Institutions: An Evolutionary Approach to Institutional Diversity” in: Heinz Rieter, Joachim Zweynert (Ed.) Economic Styles in the Process of EU Eastern Enlargement, pр. 13-54.
  • Hodgson, J. (2003), “Economic Theory and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics”, translation from English, Moscow: Delo, 464 p.
  • Index of Economic Freedom Data. (accessed 02.08.2021)
  • International Property Rights Index Data. (accessed 02.08.2021)
  • Nell, G., Signorelli, M. (2015), “Convergence and Divergence” in J. Hölscher & H. Tomann (eds) Palgrave Dictionary of Emerging Markets and Transition Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 589 р. Рр. 437-457.
  • North, D. C. (1991), “Institutions, “The Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 5:1, pp. 97-112.
  • North, D. C. (2000), “Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance”, translation from English, Kyiv: Osnovy, 140 р.
  • North, D.С., Wallis, J.J., Weingast, B.R. (2009), “Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 308 р.
  • North, D.С., Wallis, J.J., Webb, S.B., Weingast, B.R. (eds.) (2013) “In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics, and the Problems of Development”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 378 р.
  • Polterovich, V.M. (1999), “Institutional traps and economic reforms”, Ekonomika i matematicheskiye metody, Volume 35 (2), pp. 1-37.
  • Polterovich, V.M. (2004), “Institutional traps: is there a way out?”, Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost, Issue 3, pp. 5–16.
  • Polterovich V. (2008), “Institutional Trap”, In: Palgrave Macmillan (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Skott, P. (1999), “Economic divergence and institutional change: some observations on the convergence literature”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 39, Issue 3. pр. 235-247.
  • Vashkiv, О.Р. (2014), “Ways and obstacles to getting out of institutional traps”, Rehionalna ekonomika ta problemy munitsypalnoho rozvytku: zb. mat. mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. u 2-kh ch., Kyiv: Kyyivskyy ekonomichnyy naukovyy tsentr, Chapter. 2. pp. 122–124.
  • Veblen, Т.В. (1984), “The theory of the leisure class. An economic study of institutions”, translation from English, 4th Ed., Moscow: LIBROKOM, 365 p.

Publish your science journal

If you like ACCESS journals system, you can publish your journal with us at a reasonable price